Current:Home > ContactTokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages -RiskWatch
Tokyo court only holds utility responsible to compensate Fukushima evacuees and reduces damages
View
Date:2025-04-12 18:46:56
TOKYO (AP) — A Tokyo court on Tuesday held only the operator of the tsunami-wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant responsible for paying damages to dozens of evacuees.
The Tokyo High Court also slashed the amount to half of what the lower court had ordered and relieved the government of responsibility — a decision that plaintiffs and their lawyers criticized as belittling their suffering and the severity of the disaster.
The court ordered only the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, known as TEPCO, to pay a total of 23.5 million yen ($165,000) to 44 of the 47 plaintiffs, while not holding the government accountable.
Tuesday’s ruling apparently backpedaled from an earlier decision in March 2018, when the Tokyo District Court held both the government and TEPCO accountable for the disaster, which the ruling said could have been prevented if they both took better precautionary measures, ordering both to pay 59 million yen ($414,400) in damages.
The decision comes at a time when Japan’s government tries to accelerate reactor restarts to maximize nuclear energy to meet decarbonization targets, while seeking to tone down the impact of the nuclear disaster 13 years ago, and its memory gradually fades.
Three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant melted after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami hit on March 11, 2011, releasing massive amounts of radiation in the area and displacing more than 160,000 people at one point. About 27,000 of them are still unable to return home.
The government has pushed for the decontamination of affected areas and the reopening of no-go zones, and has urged evacuees to return to their homes while cutting back support for them. The government-set compensation program, which is mostly based on distance from the plant and radiation levels, has triggered divisions and discrimination among communities.
The dispute centers on whether the government could have foreseen the risk of a massive tsunami, and whether the disaster could have been averted if the government had ordered the utility to take precautions.
In the ruling, judge Hiro Misumi said the flooding of the plant because of the tsunami wasn’t preventable even if the industry ministry used its authority and ordered the utility to enhance a seawall based on a tsunami estimate at that time.
The decision is among the four rulings that apparently came in line with the June 2022 Supreme Court decision that said the government wasn’t liable for the disaster and that the disaster from a tsunami that high wasn’t foreseeable or preventable.
Motomitsu Nakagawa, a lawyer representing the plaintiffs, said that Tuesday’s high court ruling was “almost a mere copy and paste” of the top court decision and that it “makes me infuriated.”
Nakagawa said the ruling takes the disaster-hit residents’ suffering lightly, and the reduction of the amount of compensation is also tantamount to saying that the operator can get away with paying only that much damage in a disaster.
He said that he planned to discuss a possible appeal to the Supreme Court after consulting with his clients.
Yuya Kamoshita, who has evacuated to Tokyo from Iwaki, south of the Fukushima Daiichi plant with his family, said the ruling was unacceptable because it trivialized the evacuees’ sufferings, and failed to hold the government accountable even though the nuclear power plant was operated as part of the national energy policy.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Suspect detained in an explosion that killed 3 people at a Jehovah’s Witness gathering in India
- Matthew Perry's cause of death unknown; LAPD says there were no obvious signs of trauma
- Firearms charge against Washington state senator Jeff Wilson dismissed in Hong Kong court
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, Oct. 29. 2023
- National First Responders Day deals, discounts at Lowe's, Firehouse Subs, Hooters and more
- These US cities will experience frigid temperatures this week
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Going to bat for bats
Ranking
- Average rate on 30
- Busted boats, stronger storms: Florida fishers face warming waters
- Matthew Perry’s Cause of Death Deferred After Autopsy
- Horoscopes Today, October 28, 2023
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Biden wants to move fast on AI safeguards and will sign an executive order to address his concerns
- Chrishell Stause’s Feud With Jason Oppenheim’s Ex Marie-Lou Nurk Will Make Your Jaw Drop
- EU chief says investment plan for Western Balkan candidate members will require reforms
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
In early 2029, Earth will likely lock into breaching key warming threshold, scientists calculate
More than 1,000 pay tribute to Maine’s mass shooting victims on day of prayer, reflection and hope
One city’s surprising tactic to reduce gun violence: solving more nonfatal shootings
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
FIFA bans Spain's Luis Rubiales for 3 years for unwanted kiss at World Cup
American man indicted on murder charges over deadly attack on 2 U.S. women near German castle
Hurricane Otis kills at least 27 people in Mexico, authorities say